To determine which option best describes the difference in structure between the passages mentioned (though the passages themselves are not provided), we can analyze each option based on common structural elements in writing:
A) Passage 1 narrates historical events, while Passage 2 makes an argument.
B) Passage 1 gives a historical anecdote, while Passage 2 gives a personal area.
C) Passage 1 portends the future, while Passage 2 focuses on the past.
D) Passage 1 argues for peace, while Passage 2 argues for war.
Without the actual content of "Passage 1" and "Passage 2," the best choice would depend on the emphasis of each passage. However, if we assume we need to select the most logically structured difference commonly observed in text types:
- Option A identifies two distinct genres: narrative history vs. argumentative writing.
- Option B does not clearly illustrate a significant difference in structural approach between anecdote and personal narrative.
- Option C contrasts future-focused and past-focused content, which could be thematic rather than structural.
- Option D contrasts two opposing positions but doesn't necessarily define structure.
Based on typical structures found in literature and writing, Option A would be the strongest choice if one passage is primarily narrative and the other strictly argumentative. If you can provide additional context or content from the passages, I could assist further!