Question
Two rings to rule most of them is a derivative work of fantasy that leans heavily on its predecessors and delivers new. The concept at the core of the novel- that two rings forged in secrecy are able to control power - hungry people across the land- has been done before. What's more, the underdog hero who ultimately destroys the rings has striking similarities to the heros and several other popular novels. Even the setting descriptions are, at times, a mere echo of greater novels that have defined the genre. While the blue rhinoceros was mildly entertaining, overall, the book failed to earn a place on this reviewers must-read list for the year.
Which statement best evaluates the strength of the evidence used to support the critical response?
The evidence is strong because it points out several specific ways the book borrows too heavily from previous books.
The evidence is weak because the writer does not say which books the novel mimics
The evidence is weak because the writer mentions something about the book even though the argument is that the book is too derivative
The evidence is strong because the writer presents a decisive judgement based on opinions formed while reading the book
Which statement best evaluates the strength of the evidence used to support the critical response?
The evidence is strong because it points out several specific ways the book borrows too heavily from previous books.
The evidence is weak because the writer does not say which books the novel mimics
The evidence is weak because the writer mentions something about the book even though the argument is that the book is too derivative
The evidence is strong because the writer presents a decisive judgement based on opinions formed while reading the book
Answers
GPT-4o mini
The statement that best evaluates the strength of the evidence used to support the critical response is:
**The evidence is strong because it points out several specific ways the book borrows too heavily from previous books.**
This is because the reviewer provides specific examples of how the novel is derivative, such as the concept of rings controlling power-hungry individuals, the underdog hero, and the setting descriptions, which strengthens the overall critique of the book.
**The evidence is strong because it points out several specific ways the book borrows too heavily from previous books.**
This is because the reviewer provides specific examples of how the novel is derivative, such as the concept of rings controlling power-hungry individuals, the underdog hero, and the setting descriptions, which strengthens the overall critique of the book.