It would highlight goals rather than conflict.
Read the passage, then answer the question below.
Passage 3
The city square was a battlefield of ideas, where words clashed like swords. Protestors waved signs, their slogans sharp as thorns: "Freedom Now!" and "Justice for All!" Across the square, counter-protestors stood firm, their banners proclaiming "Order Must Prevail!" The mayor, perched on a podium, spoke with a voice smooth as silk but heavy with irony: "Isn't it wonderful how we all agree on peace?" The crowd roared, some with cheers, other with jeers. He continued, "Don't we all want a city where everyone thrives?" His questions hung in the air, unanswered, as the divide between the groups grew wider, like a rupture splitting the earth.
If another author described the same protest but focused on the unity of the protestors' shared desire for justice, how would their perspective differ from this passage?
(1 point)
Responses
It would emphasize division over unity.
It would emphasize division over unity.
It would ignore the role of the mayor.
It would ignore the role of the mayor.
It would focus on the counter-protestors' perspective.
It would focus on the counter-protestors' perspective.
It would highlight goals rather than conflict.
1 answer