To determine which statements are supported by the data regarding bird beak shape traits between Generation 3 and Generation 5, we can analyze the changes described in each statement:
A. The percentage of birds with Beak Shape Trait 1 remained below 5%.
Not supported. According to the description, Beak Shape Trait 1 fell below 10% in Generation 3 but did not state it dropped below 5%, and it remained steady through Generation 5.
B. The percentage of birds with Beak Shape Trait 2 decreased from 15% to 0%.
Supported. Beak Shape Trait 2 was at around 15% initially and fell to 0% by Generation 5.
C. The percentage of birds with Beak Shape Trait 4 showed a small increase to 10%.
Not supported. Beak Shape Trait 4 fell from 20% to below 10% by Generation 3 and continued to fall to about 5% in Generation 5, indicating that it did not increase to 10%.
D. The percentage of birds with Beak Shape Trait 5 steadily increased from 22% to 35%.
Not supported. The starting percentage for Beak Shape Trait 5 was stated as slightly above 20%, but it remained steady at about 40% in Generation 4, decreasing to 35% in Generation 5, meaning it did not steadily increase to 35%.
E. The percentage of birds with Beak Shape Trait 6 increased from 40% to 70%.
Supported. Beak Shape Trait 6 was described as having risen significantly to 70% in Generation 5.
Based on this analysis, the two statements that are supported by the data are:
- B. The percentage of birds with Beak Shape Trait 2 decreased from 15% to 0%.
- E. The percentage of birds with Beak Shape Trait 6 increased from 40% to 70%.