One significant political defeat for Franklin D. Roosevelt occurred when he sought to enlarge the Supreme Court to support his New Deal programs, which were facing increasing opposition from justices who were invalidating key measures. Despite having won re-election in 1936 and feeling armed with a popular mandate, Roosevelt lost this battle to expand the Supreme Court. This defeat ultimately prompted Roosevelt to adjust his policies and approach to governance.
In the passage, it is noted that after Roosevelt's unsuccessful effort to enlarge the Supreme Court, a revolution in constitutional law took place, allowing the government to legally regulate the economy. This indicates that, although he did not achieve his goal directly, the political struggle stimulated a transformation in the legal framework surrounding economic regulation. Thus, instead of continuing to focus on court expansion, Roosevelt redirected his efforts towards enacting new reforms.
For instance, following the defeat over the Supreme Court issue, Roosevelt launched an additional wave of reform initiatives that included Social Security, heavier taxes on the wealthy, and new controls over banks and public utilities. These actions not only reinforced his commitment to progressive legislation but also reflected his adaptation to the political landscape shaped by the court's resistance. This acknowledgment of the limits of his power encouraged him to pursue other avenues for enacting his vision for the country, emphasizing the importance of maintaining a broad base of support through additional reforms that could appeal to both the populace and lawmakers.
In summary, Roosevelt's defeat in attempting to expand the Supreme Court catalyzed a shift in his strategy, leading him to further pursue legislative reforms that would solidify the New Deal's legacy and demonstrate the government's role in addressing economic challenges.