Question
Use the sentence to answer the question.
Public schools should reduce the cost of cafeteria lunches.
Which reason fails to support the claim in a meaningful way?
(1 point)
Responses
Students who eat consistent meals report that they are more mentally healthy and less likely to become involved in conflicts.
Students who eat consistent meals report that they are more mentally healthy and less likely to become involved in conflicts.
Teachers report that students who eat lunch perform better during class than students who skip lunch.
Teachers report that students who eat lunch perform better during class than students who skip lunch.
All students could be able to afford a cafeteria lunch regardless of their socioeconomic class.
All students could be able to afford a cafeteria lunch regardless of their socioeconomic class.
Most cafeteria options are not particularly nutritious or accessible to students with dietary restrictions.
Public schools should reduce the cost of cafeteria lunches.
Which reason fails to support the claim in a meaningful way?
(1 point)
Responses
Students who eat consistent meals report that they are more mentally healthy and less likely to become involved in conflicts.
Students who eat consistent meals report that they are more mentally healthy and less likely to become involved in conflicts.
Teachers report that students who eat lunch perform better during class than students who skip lunch.
Teachers report that students who eat lunch perform better during class than students who skip lunch.
All students could be able to afford a cafeteria lunch regardless of their socioeconomic class.
All students could be able to afford a cafeteria lunch regardless of their socioeconomic class.
Most cafeteria options are not particularly nutritious or accessible to students with dietary restrictions.
Answers
GPT-4o mini
The reason that fails to support the claim in a meaningful way is:
**All students could be able to afford a cafeteria lunch regardless of their socioeconomic class.**
This statement does not support the argument for reducing costs, as it suggests that affordability is already universally accessible, which contradicts the need for reducing lunch costs.
**All students could be able to afford a cafeteria lunch regardless of their socioeconomic class.**
This statement does not support the argument for reducing costs, as it suggests that affordability is already universally accessible, which contradicts the need for reducing lunch costs.