Drag each item to the correct location to show which arguments are for and against each theory about the source of Earth’s water. Some arguments may be used more than once.

Question

(2 points)

Evidence for: Comets, Asteroids, Solar Nebula
Evidence against: Comets, Asteroids, Solar Nebula

Very little water is found on/in these objects. 
Spacecraft have confirmed that objects from the Oort Cloud have non-Earth-like water. 
Others like it in the galaxy have water in their dust and gases. 
The sun could have evaporated the water over the billions of years since Earth’s formation. 
Spacecraft have confirmed that objects from the Kuiper Belt have Earth-like water. 

Answer 1

Here are the arguments sorted into their respective categories:

Evidence for:

• Spacecraft have confirmed that objects from the Kuiper Belt have Earth-like water.
• Others like it in the galaxy have water in their dust and gases.

Evidence against:

• Very little water is found on/in these objects.
• Spacecraft have confirmed that objects from the Oort Cloud have non-Earth-like water.
• The sun could have evaporated the water over the billions of years since Earth’s formation.

Note: The statements related to "Comets," "Asteroids," and "Solar Nebula" serve as types of objects or origin theories rather than specific arguments, so they don't fit directly into the categories without a specific context. If the question was specifically about those items, you could attach the relevant arguments for and against them accordingly.