To evaluate the statements provided based on the data in the table, let's analyze the information:
- From the table:
- For Music Competition Level 1–3:
- Less than 5 hours of practice: 23 participants
- More than 5 hours of practice: 9 participants
- For Music Competition Level 4 or Higher:
- Less than 5 hours of practice: 10 participants
- More than 5 hours of practice: 18 participants
- For Music Competition Level 1–3:
Now let's look at the statements:
-
"All students are more likely to get a competition level of 4 or higher with less than 5 hours of practice."
- This is incorrect. There are only 10 students at a competition level of 4 or higher with less than 5 hours of practice compared to 23 students at levels 1-3.
-
"There is no association between the competition level and the number of hours of practice."
- This is not accurate. The data suggests there can be an association, as the distribution between levels and practice hours is uneven.
-
"There is an association between the competition level and the number of hours of practice."
- This seems to be the most valid statement. The distribution of participants indicates a tendency that might suggest an association.
-
"If a student practices more than 5 hours, they are more likely to be at a competition level of 1–3."
- This is inaccurate. In fact, out of those practicing more than 5 hours, the majority (18 out of 27) are at competition level 4 or higher.
Given this analysis, the correct statement based on the data provided is:
There is an association between the competition level and the number of hours of practice.