Ask a New Question
Menu

Match each evaluation to the type of critique it represents.(1 point)

Put responses in the correct input to answer the question. Select a response, navigate to the desired input and insert the response. Responses can be selected and inserted using the space bar, enter key, left mouse button or touchpad. Responses can also be moved by dragging with a mouse.
The article gives many good details but lacks a clear thesis statement. The examples seem to support a general positive feeling toward undocumented immigrants, but the text would be helped by the addition of a clear thesis statement.
The article clearly states that butterflies are disappearing in Ohio. It gives evidence in the form of data from two different studies. It explains that the butterflies are an indicator of a larger trend among all insects. Overall, the article presents a clear thesis supported by compelling evidence.
The article has no clear thesis. It begins with a discussion of rainbows but then switches to the topic of phytoplankton. Its examples are written in complicated jargon that is difficult for readers to understand. The details are not clearly linked to any central statement. The article is not effective at providing information to the reader.
Skip to navigation

1 answer

Here are the evaluations matched to their corresponding critiques:

  1. The article gives many good details but lacks a clear thesis statement. The examples seem to support a general positive feeling toward undocumented immigrants, but the text would be helped by the addition of a clear thesis statement.

    • Critique type: Lack of thesis / vague support

  2. The article clearly states that butterflies are disappearing in Ohio. It gives evidence in the form of data from two different studies. It explains that the butterflies are an indicator of a larger trend among all insects. Overall, the article presents a clear thesis supported by compelling evidence.

    • Critique type: Strong thesis / effective support

  3. The article has no clear thesis. It begins with a discussion of rainbows but then switches to the topic of phytoplankton. Its examples are written in complicated jargon that is difficult for readers to understand. The details are not clearly linked to any central statement. The article is not effective at providing information to the reader.

    • Critique type: Confusing structure / ineffective communication