The other author's perspective would focus on the time and effort needed for pet care, arguing that it overburdens kids, while this essay emphasizes the benefits of responsibility and happiness that pets provide.
Read the passage, then answer the question below. Passage 5: Persuasive Essay - "Why Kids Need Pets" Introduction Pets like dogs and cats are great for kids. They teach kids important lessons and make them happy. This essay explains why every kid should have a pet. Paragraph 1: Pets Teach Responsibility Kids learn to take care of pets by feeding them and cleaning up after them. For example, a kid with a dog has to walk it every day. This teaches kids to be responsible. Paragraph 2: Pets Make Kids Happy Pets are fun to play with and make kids feel good. Studies show that kids with pets are less sad. Playing with a cat or dog can make a bad day better. Paragraph 3: Why Some People Disagree Some people say pets are too much work or cost too much. But pets don't need to be expensive. You can adopt a pet from a shelter, and the work is worth it because pets help kids so much. Conclusion Pets teach kids to be responsible and make them happy. Every kid should have a pet. Ask your parents for a pet today! If another author wrote that pets are bad for kids because they take too much time, how would their perspective differ from this essay? (2 points) Make it short really really short. shorter then short
1 answer