-
The right being discussed in this case is the First Amendment right to free speech. The socialist's distribution of pamphlets expressing opposition to the draft is an exercise of free speech.
-
This Supreme Court decision impacts U.S. citizens by affirming the government's ability to restrict certain types of speech, especially during wartime. It suggests that the right to free speech can be curtailed if it poses a clear and present danger or is deemed a threat to national security. This precedent may lead to limits on the expression of dissenting opinions, particularly in times of national crisis.
-
A court case discussed in Unit 4 that would have a similar impact is Schenck v. United States (1919). In this case, the Supreme Court upheld the conviction of Charles Schenck for distributing leaflets opposing the draft, establishing the "clear and present danger" test for free speech limitations.
-
The case of Schenck v. United States is similar to the one summarized in that both involve the restriction of free speech during wartime and the government's authority to suppress speech that is seen as a danger to national security. However, Schenck's case established a legal standard (the clear and present danger test) that specifically evaluated the circumstances under which free speech could be limited, while the case summarized does not reference a specific legal standard but indicates a general upholding of governmental authority over dissenting speech related to the draft. Additionally, Schenck v. United States directly addressed the issue of speech causing imminent harm, while the summary focuses on the broader implications of how the government responds to opposition during wartime.
Using the summary below regarding an event that occurred during WWI, answer the following four questions. "A socialist... Distributed pamphlets stating: "... Officers of the law ... violate the ...United States Constitution, the Supreme Law of the Land, when they refuse to recognize your right to assert your opposition to the draft." The socialist was arrested and convicted for distributing these pamphlets. He appealed his arrest and conviction to the U.S. Supreme Court which uphed the government's actions" 1. Which right is being discussed in this case? 2. How does this Supreme Court decision discussed in the summary impact US citizens? 3. Which of the court cases discussed in Unit 4 would have the same impact? 4. How is the case you used in the above question different from the one summarized here? (8 points)
1 answer