Public schools should reduce the cost of cafeteria lunches.
Which reason fails to support the claim in a meaningful way?
(1 point)
Responses
Teachers report that students who eat lunch perform better during class than students who skip lunch.
Teachers report that students who eat lunch perform better during class than students who skip lunch.
All students could be able to afford a cafeteria lunch regardless of their socioeconomic class.
All students could be able to afford a cafeteria lunch regardless of their socioeconomic class.
Most cafeteria options are not particularly nutritious or accessible to students with dietary restrictions.
Most cafeteria options are not particularly nutritious or accessible to students with dietary restrictions.
Students who eat consistent meals report that they are more mentally healthy and less likely to become involved in conflicts.
Students who eat consistent meals report that they are more mentally healthy and less likely to become involved in conflicts.
Remaining Attempts : 3
Skip to navigation
1 answer
The reason that fails to support the claim in a meaningful way is:
"All students could be able to afford a cafeteria lunch regardless of their socioeconomic class."
This statement does not directly support the claim that public schools should reduce the cost of cafeteria lunches, as it suggests that affordability is not an issue for students. In contrast, the other reasons provide evidence of the benefits of eating lunch or highlight issues with existing cafeteria options.
