Question

Use the passage to answer the question. The planet is dying from greenhouse gas emissions, and our only hope is for legislators to create laws that reduce them. The planet’s fate is in the hands of our lawmakers; they must act, or the planet will perish. How should this passage be revised to improve the argumentative writing? (1 point) Responses The writer needs to be more serious about the topic. The writer needs to be more serious about the topic. The counterargument is weak. The counterargument is weak. The argument lacks logic and a precise claim. The argument lacks logic and a precise claim. The tone is overly emotional and should be more objective.

Answer 1

The most appropriate response is: **The argument lacks logic and a precise claim.**

This revision suggests that the passage could benefit from a more structured argument and clear, specific claims that strengthen the overall message. While seriousness and tone are important, establishing a logical framework and precise claims is essential for effective argumentative writing.