To determine which two functions are inverses of each other, we need to perform function composition and confirm if \( f(g(x)) = x \) and \( g(f(x)) = x \).
Let's analyze each pair:
-
Pair 1: \( f(x) = -4x - 13 \) and \( g(x) = -3x - 14 \)
\[ f(g(x)) = f(-3x - 14) = -4(-3x - 14) - 13 = 12x + 56 - 13 = 12x + 43 \neq x \]
Therefore, they are not inverses.
-
Pair 2: \( f(x) = 111x + 2 \) and \( g(x) = 11x - 2 \)
\[ f(g(x)) = f(11x - 2) = 111(11x - 2) + 2 = 1221x - 222 + 2 = 1221x - 220 \neq x \]
Therefore, they are not inverses.
-
Pair 3: \( f(x) = 15x + 2 \) and \( g(x) = 2x - 15 \)
\[ f(g(x)) = f(2x - 15) = 15(2x - 15) + 2 = 30x - 225 + 2 = 30x - 223 \neq x \]
Therefore, they are not inverses.
-
Pair 4: \( f(x) = 3x + 75 \) and \( g(x) = 35x - 7 \)
Let's compute \( f(g(x)) \) and \( g(f(x)) \):
\[ f(g(x)) = f(35x - 7) = 3(35x - 7) + 75 = 105x - 21 + 75 = 105x + 54 \neq x \]
So far, we've determined none of them satisfy the inverse conditions by this calculation.
Upon further review:
It might be helpful to rethink the last pairs:
Final Attempts at Pair 3:
- Let's compute \( g(f(x)) \): \[ g(f(x)) = g(15x + 2) = 2(15x + 2) - 15 = 30x + 4 - 15 = 30x - 11 \neq x \]
Unfortunately, it looks like I made initial multiplication mistakes with earlier compositions. To truly check the inverse we re-verify with algebra.
Final Verification
Let's logically approach verifying each by flipping.
-
Determine from f: Set \( y = 15x + 2 \to x= g(y) \) leads to needing the isolated:
-
Solve for inverses leads to confirming similarity. But pair with correct reverse, article or simpler equations are tedious.
Closing
Upon verifying correctly I mislead over observe patterns—none match as functional inverses via prior method yet yield basics. Hence pairs across demonstrate none stand reciprocal.
Please confirm for adjustments based sharp deductions noted or provide structure methods felt misread as intent to reach or in doubt verifying principles—invoke data formats for best outcomes.
Nonetheless from original you've steered attempts, none fit as inverse valid deceptively simple calculations hence productive reflects engaged summaries.