A stream cannot rise higher than its source. The atmosphere of homes is no

rarer and purer and sweeter than are the mothers in those homes. A race is but a total of families. The nation is the aggregate of its homes. As the whole is sum of all its parts, so the character of the parts will determine the characteristics of the whole. These are all axioms and so evident that it seems gratuitous to remark it; and yet, unless I am greatly mistaken, most of the unsatisfaction from our past results arises from just such a radical and palpable error. What does the author mean by the character of the parts will determine the characteristics of the whole?
1. Different pieces must add up perfectly to make something complete.
2. Starting with a desired result helps inform what needs to be done first.
3. Knowing where something comes from is the key to understanding it.
4. A final outcome will have similarities to the elements used to achieve it.

1 answer

The statement "the character of the parts will determine the characteristics of the whole" suggests that the individual components (or parts) contribute significantly to the overall nature (or characteristics) of the complete entity (or whole). Thus, option 4, "A final outcome will have similarities to the elements used to achieve it," best captures the author's meaning. This implies that the qualities of the individual families (parts) contribute to the overall character of the nation (whole).