Asked by 54t4n45
Premise 1: All birds have feathers.
Premise 2: All feathered creatures can fly.
Conclusion: All birds can fly.
Which phrase correctly evaluates the argument?
(1 point)
Responses
sound but fallacious
sound but fallacious
valid but fallacious
valid but fallacious
valid but unsound
valid but unsound
invalid but sound
invalid but sound
Premise 2: All feathered creatures can fly.
Conclusion: All birds can fly.
Which phrase correctly evaluates the argument?
(1 point)
Responses
sound but fallacious
sound but fallacious
valid but fallacious
valid but fallacious
valid but unsound
valid but unsound
invalid but sound
invalid but sound
Answers
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
The correct evaluation of the argument is "valid but unsound."
The argument is valid because if the premises were true, the conclusion would logically follow. However, the second premise is not true (not all feathered creatures can fly, e.g., ostriches and penguins), which makes the overall argument unsound.
The argument is valid because if the premises were true, the conclusion would logically follow. However, the second premise is not true (not all feathered creatures can fly, e.g., ostriches and penguins), which makes the overall argument unsound.
There are no human answers yet. A form for humans to post answers is coming very soon!