Question
Question 1 (100 points)
Match each description to the correct Supreme Court case.
Column A
1.
Kent vs United States 1966:
Kent vs United States 1966
2.
In Re Gault 1967:
In Re Gault 1967
3.
In re Winship:
In re Winship
4.
McKeiver vs Pennsylvania 1971:
McKeiver vs Pennsylvania 1971
5.
Schall vs Martin 1984:
Schall vs Martin 1984
Column B
a.The court can decide to send juveniles to preventive detention if it was determined that they posed a risk of committing additional crimes while awaiting court action.
b.Juveniles have a right to counsel and a hearing if the judge is considering to send their case to adult court.
c.Juveniles do not have the right to a trial by jury.
d.Juveniles are entitled to many of the same basic procedural safeguards granted to adult offenders in all juvenile cases. Such rights include confronting witnesses, defense counsel, notice of charges, and privilege against self-incrimination.
e.The government must prove "beyond a reasonable doubt" that a juvenile had committed an act of delinquency, raising the burden of proof from "preponderance of the evidence".
Match each description to the correct Supreme Court case.
Column A
1.
Kent vs United States 1966:
Kent vs United States 1966
2.
In Re Gault 1967:
In Re Gault 1967
3.
In re Winship:
In re Winship
4.
McKeiver vs Pennsylvania 1971:
McKeiver vs Pennsylvania 1971
5.
Schall vs Martin 1984:
Schall vs Martin 1984
Column B
a.The court can decide to send juveniles to preventive detention if it was determined that they posed a risk of committing additional crimes while awaiting court action.
b.Juveniles have a right to counsel and a hearing if the judge is considering to send their case to adult court.
c.Juveniles do not have the right to a trial by jury.
d.Juveniles are entitled to many of the same basic procedural safeguards granted to adult offenders in all juvenile cases. Such rights include confronting witnesses, defense counsel, notice of charges, and privilege against self-incrimination.
e.The government must prove "beyond a reasonable doubt" that a juvenile had committed an act of delinquency, raising the burden of proof from "preponderance of the evidence".
Answers
GPT-4o mini
Here's the match of each description from Column A to Column B:
1. Kent vs United States 1966: **b. Juveniles have a right to counsel and a hearing if the judge is considering to send their case to adult court.**
2. In Re Gault 1967: **d. Juveniles are entitled to many of the same basic procedural safeguards granted to adult offenders in all juvenile cases. Such rights include confronting witnesses, defense counsel, notice of charges, and privilege against self-incrimination.**
3. In re Winship: **e. The government must prove "beyond a reasonable doubt" that a juvenile had committed an act of delinquency, raising the burden of proof from "preponderance of the evidence".**
4. McKeiver vs Pennsylvania 1971: **c. Juveniles do not have the right to a trial by jury.**
5. Schall vs Martin 1984: **a. The court can decide to send juveniles to preventive detention if it was determined that they posed a risk of committing additional crimes while awaiting court action.**
1. Kent vs United States 1966: **b. Juveniles have a right to counsel and a hearing if the judge is considering to send their case to adult court.**
2. In Re Gault 1967: **d. Juveniles are entitled to many of the same basic procedural safeguards granted to adult offenders in all juvenile cases. Such rights include confronting witnesses, defense counsel, notice of charges, and privilege against self-incrimination.**
3. In re Winship: **e. The government must prove "beyond a reasonable doubt" that a juvenile had committed an act of delinquency, raising the burden of proof from "preponderance of the evidence".**
4. McKeiver vs Pennsylvania 1971: **c. Juveniles do not have the right to a trial by jury.**
5. Schall vs Martin 1984: **a. The court can decide to send juveniles to preventive detention if it was determined that they posed a risk of committing additional crimes while awaiting court action.**