The best response is:
The author gives the background of the quarrel as an omniscient observer but then shifts to Ulrich’s point of view, limiting what the reader knows of Georg’s movements.
This option highlights how the narration begins with an objective overview of the feud, creating a solid backdrop for readers to understand the conflict, and then transitions into Ulrich's perspective. This shift creates a sense of surprise when Ulrich unexpectedly encounters his rival, Georg Znaeym, as the reader is left in the dark about Georg's actions and motivations while focusing on Ulrich's desires and intentions. This juxtaposition enhances the dramatic tension and surprise of the moment.