To model the situation described, note the initial deposit of $100 at Roy's first birthday and the subsequent annual deposits of $80 starting from his second birthday. We can derive the model step-by-step.
- At Roy's first birthday (n=1), the account balance is $100.
- At Roy's second birthday (n=2), the account balance becomes $100 + $80 = $180.
- At Roy's third birthday (n=3), the account balance is $100 + $80 + $80 = $260.
- At Roy's fourth birthday (n=4), the account balance becomes $100 + $80 + $80 + $80 = $340.
From this, we can see that the total amount in the account after \( n \) years can be expressed as:
\[ f(n) = 100 + 80 \times (n - 1) \]
Here, \( 100 \) is the initial deposit, and \( 80 \times (n - 1) \) accounts for the additional deposits starting after the first year.
Thus, the correct function that models the situation is:
\[ f(n) = 100 + 80(n - 1) \]
So, the correct option is:
f(n) = 100 + 80(n - 1).