Question
Prehistoric cave paintings were discovered in a cave in France. The paint contained 31 % of the original carbon-14. Use the exponential decay model for carbon-14, Upper A equals Upper A 0 e Superscript negative 0.000121 t, to estimate the age of the paintings.
Question content area bottom
Part 1
The paintings are approximately
enter your response here years old. (Round to the nearest integer.)
Question content area bottom
Part 1
The paintings are approximately
enter your response here years old. (Round to the nearest integer.)
Answers
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To estimate the age of the prehistoric cave paintings using the exponential decay model for carbon-14, we start with the formula given:
\[
A = A_0 e^{-0.000121t}
\]
Where:
- \( A \) is the amount of carbon-14 remaining (31% of the original amount).
- \( A_0 \) is the original amount of carbon-14.
- \( t \) is the time in years.
- \( e \) is the base of the natural logarithm.
Since the paintings contain 31% of the original carbon-14, we can express:
\[
A = 0.31 A_0
\]
Substituting this into the model gives:
\[
0.31 A_0 = A_0 e^{-0.000121t}
\]
We can cancel \( A_0 \) from both sides (assuming \( A_0 \) is not zero):
\[
0.31 = e^{-0.000121t}
\]
Next, we take the natural logarithm of both sides:
\[
\ln(0.31) = -0.000121t
\]
Now we solve for \( t \):
\[
t = \frac{\ln(0.31)}{-0.000121}
\]
Calculating \( \ln(0.31) \):
\[
\ln(0.31) \approx -1.171
\]
Now substituting this into the equation for \( t \):
\[
t \approx \frac{-1.171}{-0.000121} \approx 9685.12
\]
Rounding to the nearest integer gives:
\[
t \approx 9685 \text{ years}
\]
Therefore, the paintings are approximately **9685** years old.
\[
A = A_0 e^{-0.000121t}
\]
Where:
- \( A \) is the amount of carbon-14 remaining (31% of the original amount).
- \( A_0 \) is the original amount of carbon-14.
- \( t \) is the time in years.
- \( e \) is the base of the natural logarithm.
Since the paintings contain 31% of the original carbon-14, we can express:
\[
A = 0.31 A_0
\]
Substituting this into the model gives:
\[
0.31 A_0 = A_0 e^{-0.000121t}
\]
We can cancel \( A_0 \) from both sides (assuming \( A_0 \) is not zero):
\[
0.31 = e^{-0.000121t}
\]
Next, we take the natural logarithm of both sides:
\[
\ln(0.31) = -0.000121t
\]
Now we solve for \( t \):
\[
t = \frac{\ln(0.31)}{-0.000121}
\]
Calculating \( \ln(0.31) \):
\[
\ln(0.31) \approx -1.171
\]
Now substituting this into the equation for \( t \):
\[
t \approx \frac{-1.171}{-0.000121} \approx 9685.12
\]
Rounding to the nearest integer gives:
\[
t \approx 9685 \text{ years}
\]
Therefore, the paintings are approximately **9685** years old.
There are no human answers yet. A form for humans to post answers is coming very soon!