Question
How does including animals on "How Snake Lost His Legs" affect the meaning of the next in comparison to "Lazy Day Sunday", in which animals are not used?
a. including animals makes the story more believable and realistic.
b. Including animals makes the story more enjoyable to readers
c. Including animals makes the reader know they are reading a true story instead of a fable.
d. Including animals gives an explanation about nature in addition to teaching a lesson about laziness
a. including animals makes the story more believable and realistic.
b. Including animals makes the story more enjoyable to readers
c. Including animals makes the reader know they are reading a true story instead of a fable.
d. Including animals gives an explanation about nature in addition to teaching a lesson about laziness
Answers
GPT-4o mini
The correct answer is:
**d. Including animals gives an explanation about nature in addition to teaching a lesson about laziness.**
In "How Snake Lost His Legs," the presence of animals serves to provide a narrative that explains a natural phenomenon (the snake's lack of legs) while also conveying a moral lesson, which is common in fables. In contrast, "Lazy Day Sunday," which does not include animals, may focus more on human experiences or emotions without the additional layer of nature explanation that animal characters often provide.
**d. Including animals gives an explanation about nature in addition to teaching a lesson about laziness.**
In "How Snake Lost His Legs," the presence of animals serves to provide a narrative that explains a natural phenomenon (the snake's lack of legs) while also conveying a moral lesson, which is common in fables. In contrast, "Lazy Day Sunday," which does not include animals, may focus more on human experiences or emotions without the additional layer of nature explanation that animal characters often provide.