To determine which graph would best support Farrah's proposal to pave the empty lot for more student parking, we need to consider the type of information that would be most relevant.
-
W: This could show the number of students parking on the street versus the parking lot capacity, which would directly illustrate the need for more parking.
-
X: This might provide a comparison of parking spots over time or available parking space versus the number of students, highlighting the inadequacy of current parking options.
-
Y: This could represent surveys about student opinions on parking availability, showing how many students are affected by the lack of parking.
-
Z: This might depict potential increased attendance or student satisfaction if parking is improved, suggesting tangible benefits of paving the lot.
To gather support for paving an empty lot behind the school, the ideal graph would highlight the issue: the inadequacy of current parking as it relates to student needs.
Thus, the best choice would likely be:
A. W - it likely addresses the issue of insufficient parking directly, illustrating the need for more student parking spots.