Question
How was the supreme court ruling in the case Carpenter v. the United States influential?(1 point)
Responses
It ruled that data on a cell phone must be obtained using a warrant.
It ruled that data on a cell phone must be obtained using a warrant.
It ruled that facial filters are facial recognition.
It ruled that facial filters are facial recognition.
It ruled against net neutrality by declaring it information services.
It ruled against net neutrality by declaring it information services.
It ruled that cell location data must be obtained using a warrant.
It ruled that cell location data must be obtained using a warrant.
Responses
It ruled that data on a cell phone must be obtained using a warrant.
It ruled that data on a cell phone must be obtained using a warrant.
It ruled that facial filters are facial recognition.
It ruled that facial filters are facial recognition.
It ruled against net neutrality by declaring it information services.
It ruled against net neutrality by declaring it information services.
It ruled that cell location data must be obtained using a warrant.
It ruled that cell location data must be obtained using a warrant.
Answers
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
The correct response is:
**It ruled that cell location data must be obtained using a warrant.**
The Supreme Court's ruling in Carpenter v. United States established that law enforcement must obtain a warrant to access an individual's historical cell location data, reinforcing the protection of privacy under the Fourth Amendment.
**It ruled that cell location data must be obtained using a warrant.**
The Supreme Court's ruling in Carpenter v. United States established that law enforcement must obtain a warrant to access an individual's historical cell location data, reinforcing the protection of privacy under the Fourth Amendment.
There are no human answers yet. A form for humans to post answers is coming very soon!