Question

Which of the following pieces of evidence would best support the argument that humans are more evolutionarily related to fish than they are to insects?(1 point) Responses The early stages of embryo development in fish and humans look strikingly similar while insects develop very differently compared to both fish and humans. The early stages of embryo development in fish and humans look strikingly similar while insects develop very differently compared to both fish and humans. All these organisms require oxygen to survive. All these organisms require oxygen to survive. The earliest fish fossils are found in the lowest strata of sedimentary rocks, followed by insects, and then humans. The earliest fish fossils are found in the lowest strata of sedimentary rocks, followed by insects, and then humans. Fossils of ancient fish and human ancestors have been discovered in the same sedimentary rock layers.

Answer 1

The piece of evidence that would best support the argument that humans are more evolutionarily related to fish than they are to insects is:

"The early stages of embryo development in fish and humans look strikingly similar while insects develop very differently compared to both fish and humans."

This evidence highlights the similarities in embryonic development, which is a strong indicator of evolutionary relationships, suggesting that humans and fish share a more recent common ancestor than either does with insects.