Question
Total Communication was a form of education that used signed, oral, written, and visual instruction to teach English and ASL simultaneously; however, this type of education is not often used anymore. Why do you think that is? Identify and evaluate some of the issues with this type of education. Are there any positive aspects of Total Communication that you can identify?
Answers
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
Total Communication (TC) was a method designed to provide a more inclusive environment for teaching deaf and hard-of-hearing students by combining different modes of communication, such as American Sign Language (ASL), spoken language, written text, and visual aids. While its aim was to support language acquisition and effective communication, several factors have contributed to the decline of this approach in favor of more specialized strategies, such as Total ASL immersion or oralism.
### Issues with Total Communication:
1. **Inconsistency:** Total Communication often relies on a mix of modalities, which can lead to confusion among learners. Students might receive mixed signals about which form of communication is "primary," potentially interfering with their ability to fully develop proficiency in any single mode of communication.
2. **Lack of Standardization:** Since TC encompasses various forms of communication, it can differ significantly from one educator to another. This lack of uniformity may hinder consistent learning experiences for students and can complicate their language acquisition processes.
3. **Cognitive Overload:** Simultaneously processing multiple languages or modalities may overwhelm some students. If they are required to juggle between spoken and signed communication, it might hinder their overall comprehension and engagement.
4. **Teacher Training:** Effective implementation of Total Communication requires educators to be well-versed in multiple communication methods. The availability of well-trained educators who can seamlessly integrate these forms is often limited, impacting the quality of education.
5. **Negative Perceptions:** Over time, there has been a shift in values within the deaf community and educational philosophy, leading to a preference for immersion in ASL or oral/aural methods. Some may view TC as a compromise that does not respect the deaf community's culture and language.
### Positive Aspects of Total Communication:
1. **Flexibility:** Total Communication allows for individualized teaching methods that can cater to the diverse capabilities and needs of students, enabling them to utilize the mode that works best for them at any given moment.
2. **Multi-Modal Learning:** Since TC incorporates various sensory modalities, it can enhance the learning experience by providing different avenues for students to access information and express themselves. This can support learners who may struggle with one method alone.
3. **Encouragement of Communication:** By employing multiple forms of communication, TC encourages students to engage and communicate, which can foster social interaction and improve their overall social skills.
4. **Gradual Language Acquisition:** For students who are transitioning between different modalities, Total Communication may serve as a bridge, allowing them to acquire language skills more organically in a supportive environment.
5. **Cultural Appreciation:** TC can potentially serve to highlight the importance of both signed and spoken languages in facilitating understanding and communication between deaf and hearing communities.
### Conclusion:
Though Total Communication has become less prevalent in contemporary education systems, its emphasis on a multisensory approach underscores some valuable concepts in teaching and communication strategies. While it has limitations, particularly concerning consistency and language acquisition, its flexible methodology and dedication to inclusivity are noteworthy. Educators and policymakers must strive to balance the benefits of Total Communication's inclusivity with the need for clear, focused language development methods to better serve the diverse needs of deaf and hard-of-hearing students.
### Issues with Total Communication:
1. **Inconsistency:** Total Communication often relies on a mix of modalities, which can lead to confusion among learners. Students might receive mixed signals about which form of communication is "primary," potentially interfering with their ability to fully develop proficiency in any single mode of communication.
2. **Lack of Standardization:** Since TC encompasses various forms of communication, it can differ significantly from one educator to another. This lack of uniformity may hinder consistent learning experiences for students and can complicate their language acquisition processes.
3. **Cognitive Overload:** Simultaneously processing multiple languages or modalities may overwhelm some students. If they are required to juggle between spoken and signed communication, it might hinder their overall comprehension and engagement.
4. **Teacher Training:** Effective implementation of Total Communication requires educators to be well-versed in multiple communication methods. The availability of well-trained educators who can seamlessly integrate these forms is often limited, impacting the quality of education.
5. **Negative Perceptions:** Over time, there has been a shift in values within the deaf community and educational philosophy, leading to a preference for immersion in ASL or oral/aural methods. Some may view TC as a compromise that does not respect the deaf community's culture and language.
### Positive Aspects of Total Communication:
1. **Flexibility:** Total Communication allows for individualized teaching methods that can cater to the diverse capabilities and needs of students, enabling them to utilize the mode that works best for them at any given moment.
2. **Multi-Modal Learning:** Since TC incorporates various sensory modalities, it can enhance the learning experience by providing different avenues for students to access information and express themselves. This can support learners who may struggle with one method alone.
3. **Encouragement of Communication:** By employing multiple forms of communication, TC encourages students to engage and communicate, which can foster social interaction and improve their overall social skills.
4. **Gradual Language Acquisition:** For students who are transitioning between different modalities, Total Communication may serve as a bridge, allowing them to acquire language skills more organically in a supportive environment.
5. **Cultural Appreciation:** TC can potentially serve to highlight the importance of both signed and spoken languages in facilitating understanding and communication between deaf and hearing communities.
### Conclusion:
Though Total Communication has become less prevalent in contemporary education systems, its emphasis on a multisensory approach underscores some valuable concepts in teaching and communication strategies. While it has limitations, particularly concerning consistency and language acquisition, its flexible methodology and dedication to inclusivity are noteworthy. Educators and policymakers must strive to balance the benefits of Total Communication's inclusivity with the need for clear, focused language development methods to better serve the diverse needs of deaf and hard-of-hearing students.
There are no human answers yet. A form for humans to post answers is coming very soon!