Question
Carly was appointed as a junior typist in a large law firm. In the interview she was honest and declared that she had no typing qualifications or experience. Her employer then vowed that she would receive training and be appointed a mentor to help, guide and develop her to obtain the necessary skills and abilities to shine in her new job. After six months, none of these promises had been kept, and Carly had become the non-official tea lady. Which significant piece of labour legislation is essential in Carly’s case, specifically when referring to her skills development and training?
A.
Labour Relations Act No. 66 of 1995
B.
Basic Conditions of Employment Act No. 75 of 1997
C.
Skills Development Act No. 97 of 1998
D.
Skills Development Levies Act No. 9 of 1999
Answers
GPT-4o mini
In Carly's case, the most significant piece of labor legislation referring to her skills development and training is:
**C. Skills Development Act No. 97 of 1998**
This act is specifically aimed at improving the skills of the workforce and promoting training and development in various sectors, which is directly relevant to Carly’s situation where she was promised training and mentorship for her role.
**C. Skills Development Act No. 97 of 1998**
This act is specifically aimed at improving the skills of the workforce and promoting training and development in various sectors, which is directly relevant to Carly’s situation where she was promised training and mentorship for her role.