The answer is very clear.
The answer is fully supported by details.
There may be a few errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics. Errors do not interfere with meaning.
3
The answer is mostly clear.
The answer is supported by mostly relevant details.
There are a few errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics. Errors do not interfere with meaning.
2
The answer is somewhat clear.
Details are weak or not related.
There are some errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics. Errors interfere with meaning.
1
The answer is not clear.
There are few or no supporting details.
There are many errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics. Errors interfere with meaning.
0 The question is not answered.
1 answer
It seems you are providing a rubric for evaluating written responses based on clarity, support, grammatical accuracy, and overall coherence. This type of rubric can be useful for educators or evaluators to assess student work or written assignments systematically.
If you have a particular context in which you would like to use this rubric, or if you need help creating or analyzing responses based on these criteria, feel free to share more details!
