To analyze how the last account in their own words is different from the information presented in "Designed to Detain," we can consider the context of the options provided:
-
The account gives more specific information. - This suggests that the last account offers detailed insights or facts that may not have been highlighted in "Designed to Detain."
-
The account is more negative. - This indicates that the last account expresses a more critical or pessimistic view compared to the tone or perspective of "Designed to Detain."
-
The account gives a positive view. - This option implies that the last account presents an optimistic or favorable perspective, contrasting with the information or tone in "Designed to Detain."
-
The account is historically correct. - This suggests that the last account is factually accurate and may align with historical accounts, whereas "Designed to Detain" could be seen as less accurate or presenting a different narrative.
To choose the most relevant option, one would need to reflect on the content of both the last account and "Designed to Detain." If the last account emphasizes specific details or offers a critique not present in "Designed to Detain," the most fitting choice would be that it either gives more specific information or is more negative. Conversely, if it presents a more optimistic view, that would indicate a positive perspective. If it aligns closely with historical facts, the last account would be valuable for its historical correctness.
Without additional context or details about these texts, it's challenging to determine the definitive answer. However, the options clarify the nature of the differences we might expect between personal accounts and analytical texts like "Designed to Detain."