A writer develops an argument or critique primarily by using details from a text to judge the value of the text and whether the author achieved their goal in writing it. This approach allows the writer to engage deeply with the text, examining specific elements such as themes, character development, narrative style, and the effectiveness of the author's techniques.
Here's a breakdown of how this is typically accomplished:
-
Close Reading: The writer analyzes key passages, looking for significant details that reveal the author's intentions and the text's overall message.
-
Thesis Statement: The writer formulates a clear argument or assertion about the text, often in the form of a thesis statement, which serves as the foundation for the critique.
-
Textual Evidence: The writer supports their thesis by quoting or paraphrasing specific examples from the text, demonstrating how these details contribute to the author’s goals or the effectiveness of the work.
-
Analysis: Beyond just presenting evidence, the writer explains how the selected details function within the text. This may involve exploring literary devices, character motivations, or thematic elements.
-
Evaluation: The writer assesses the effectiveness of the author’s choices and whether they resonate with the intended audience, ultimately judging the value of the text based on the evidence gathered.
-
Conclusion: The writer typically wraps up by reinforcing their main argument and reflecting on the broader implications of the critique, perhaps considering how the text fits within a larger literary context or its relevance today.
By following this structured approach, a writer can deliver a nuanced critique that not only analyzes the text but also engages readers in a conversation about its significance.