Abraham Lincoln's plan for Southern Reconstruction, commonly referred to as the 10% Plan, was characterized by the Radical Republicans as too lenient and permissive. The 10% Plan proposed that a Southern state could be readmitted into the Union once 10% of its voters from the 1860 election took an oath of allegiance to the Union and accepted the end of slavery. This approach was seen by Lincoln as a way to encourage rapid reconciliation and healing following the Civil War.
However, the Radical Republicans, who held a more hardline stance toward the South and were focused on securing civil rights and political power for newly freed African Americans, criticized Lincoln's plan for several reasons:
-
Insufficient Protection for Freedmen: They believed it did not go far enough in protecting the rights and welfare of formerly enslaved individuals. They wanted more stringent measures to ensure civil rights and economic opportunities for African Americans.
-
Rapid Readmission: The Radical Republicans felt that Lincoln's plan allowed Southern states to rejoin the Union too easily and quickly, without adequately addressing the changes needed in Southern society and governance post-war.
-
Lack of Accountability: The plan did not impose significant consequences or accountability on the Confederate states for their actions during the Civil War, which the Radical Republicans saw as necessary to prevent future insurrections and ensure loyalty to the Union.
Overall, the Radical Republicans advocated for a more comprehensive and punitive approach to Reconstruction, culminating in legislation such as the Reconstruction Act of 1867, which imposed military rule on Southern states and aimed to fundamentally reshape Southern society and governance. Lincoln’s 10% Plan thus represented a stark contrast to the Radical Republicans’ vision for how to rebuild and reform the South after the Civil War.