Question
In this discussion, you will evaluate a large company’s responsibility for supply line conditions, both human and environmental, involving rock and mineral resources. If you have not already done so, read all three articles found in Unit 4 Lesson 12, and include specific information found in the reading to include as evidence for your answers to the questions. Company Accountability Case Study Apple Cracks Down on Cobalt Supplier Mexico Mine Spill Use a word processing document to check your work. Students will lose partial points for any typos, spelling errors, and incorrect capitalization/punctuation. 3 complete sentences are required for full credit. (3 points) 1. How should a large company, for example Apple, respond to learning about an environmental accident or disaster at a copper mine they purchase materials from? Explain three actions they should take, and the why or how for each step. (3 points) 0 / 10000 Word Limit Question 2 1-2 complete sentences required for full credit. (2 points) 2. Do you think companies have a responsibility to use suppliers that follow local laws and do not have a history of violations, child labor, or other unsafe working conditions? Why or why not? (2 points) 0 / 10000 Word Limit Question 3 1-2 complete sentences required for full credit. (1 point) 3. Who do you think has the responsibility to clean up damage created by the environmental accidents? Why or why not? (1 point) In this discussion, you will evaluate a large company’s responsibility for supply line conditions, both human and environmental, involving rock and mineral resources. If you have not already done so, read all three articles found in Unit 4 Lesson 12, and include specific information found in the reading to include as evidence for your answers to the questions. Company Accountability Case Study Apple Cracks Down on Cobalt Supplier Mexico Mine Spill Use a word processing document to check your work. Students will lose partial points for any typos, spelling errors, and incorrect capitalization/punctuation. 3 complete sentences are required for full credit. (3 points) 1. How should a large company, for example Apple, respond to learning about an environmental accident or disaster at a copper mine they purchase materials from? Explain three actions they should take, and the why or how for each step. (3 points) BoldItalicUnderlineBullet listNumbered list 0 / 10000 Word Limit Question 2 1-2 complete sentences required for full credit. (2 points) 2. Do you think companies have a responsibility to use suppliers that follow local laws and do not have a history of violations, child labor, or other unsafe working conditions? Why or why not? (2 points) BoldItalicUnderlineBullet listNumbered list 0 / 10000 Word Limit Question 3 1-2 complete sentences required for full credit. (1 point) 3. Who do you think has the responsibility to clean up damage created by the environmental accidents? Why or why not? (1 point) BoldItalicUnderlineBullet listNumbered list 244 / 10000 Word Limit244 words written of 10000 allowed Question 4 1-2 complete sentences required for full credit. (1 point) 4. Should the company be required to pay funds to workers and townspeople affected by the disaster? Why or why not? (1 point) 0 / 10000 Word Limit Question 5 1-2 complete sentences required for full credit. (1 point) 5. Do you think the main goal of large companies should focus on selling a product for a profit? Why or why not? (1 point) 0 / 10000 Word Limit Question 6 1-2 complete sentences required for full credit. (2 points) 6. Would you be willing to pay more for a product that is created in an environmentally friendly and with sustainable practice? Explain why or why not, and any ideas that influence your decision. (2 points)
Answers
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
### Question 1
When a large company like Apple learns about an environmental disaster at a copper mine from which they source materials, they should take immediate and significant actions to address the situation. First, Apple should conduct a thorough investigation of the incident to determine the specifics of the environmental impact and the parties involved. This investigation is critical as it helps the company assess the damage and understand the root causes, guiding their future sourcing decisions and risk management strategies. Second, Apple should immediately communicate with stakeholders, including local communities and environmental organizations, to express concern, outline their response plan, and foster transparency in the process. Open communication is essential for rebuilding trust and demonstrating corporate responsibility. Finally, Apple should review and possibly suspend contracts with the responsible suppliers until they can prove compliance with environmental standards and regulations. By taking these steps, Apple can reinforce its commitment to ethical sourcing and sustainability, mitigating potential reputational damage and aligning with consumer expectations for corporate accountability.
### Question 2
Yes, companies have a responsibility to use suppliers that follow local laws and have no history of labor violations, child labor, or unsafe working conditions. This responsibility stems from the ethical obligation to ensure that their supply chains do not perpetuate social injustices and to uphold the rights and safety of workers.
### Question 3
The primary responsibility for cleaning up damage caused by environmental accidents lies with the company that owns or operates the mine. Companies are accountable for their operations and must take initiative to mitigate the consequences of their actions, ensuring that affected communities receive proper restitution and environmental restoration.
### Question 4
Yes, the company should be required to pay funds to workers and townspeople affected by the disaster. Providing compensation is essential for addressing the immediate needs of those impacted, assisting in recovery, and demonstrating the company's commitment to corporate social responsibility.
### Question 5
While generating profit is crucial for large companies, their main goal should also include a commitment to ethical practices and sustainability. Balancing profitability with social and environmental responsibilities can build stronger brand loyalty and long-term success.
### Question 6
I would be willing to pay more for a product created in environmentally friendly and sustainable ways. This willingness comes from a strong belief in supporting ethical practices and a desire to contribute to preserving our environment, as well as influencing future corporate behaviors towards sustainability.
When a large company like Apple learns about an environmental disaster at a copper mine from which they source materials, they should take immediate and significant actions to address the situation. First, Apple should conduct a thorough investigation of the incident to determine the specifics of the environmental impact and the parties involved. This investigation is critical as it helps the company assess the damage and understand the root causes, guiding their future sourcing decisions and risk management strategies. Second, Apple should immediately communicate with stakeholders, including local communities and environmental organizations, to express concern, outline their response plan, and foster transparency in the process. Open communication is essential for rebuilding trust and demonstrating corporate responsibility. Finally, Apple should review and possibly suspend contracts with the responsible suppliers until they can prove compliance with environmental standards and regulations. By taking these steps, Apple can reinforce its commitment to ethical sourcing and sustainability, mitigating potential reputational damage and aligning with consumer expectations for corporate accountability.
### Question 2
Yes, companies have a responsibility to use suppliers that follow local laws and have no history of labor violations, child labor, or unsafe working conditions. This responsibility stems from the ethical obligation to ensure that their supply chains do not perpetuate social injustices and to uphold the rights and safety of workers.
### Question 3
The primary responsibility for cleaning up damage caused by environmental accidents lies with the company that owns or operates the mine. Companies are accountable for their operations and must take initiative to mitigate the consequences of their actions, ensuring that affected communities receive proper restitution and environmental restoration.
### Question 4
Yes, the company should be required to pay funds to workers and townspeople affected by the disaster. Providing compensation is essential for addressing the immediate needs of those impacted, assisting in recovery, and demonstrating the company's commitment to corporate social responsibility.
### Question 5
While generating profit is crucial for large companies, their main goal should also include a commitment to ethical practices and sustainability. Balancing profitability with social and environmental responsibilities can build stronger brand loyalty and long-term success.
### Question 6
I would be willing to pay more for a product created in environmentally friendly and sustainable ways. This willingness comes from a strong belief in supporting ethical practices and a desire to contribute to preserving our environment, as well as influencing future corporate behaviors towards sustainability.
There are no human answers yet. A form for humans to post answers is coming very soon!