The tool that is likely NOT to be discussed in Marissa's paper about the evolution of medical technology that assists the deaf-blind community is closed-captioning systems. Closed-captioning is primarily designed for individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing and relies on visual text display, which may not be accessible to individuals who are also blind. The other options—Braille, speechreading, and tactile signing—are more directly relevant to tools that assist the deaf-blind community.
Your friend Marissa is writing a paper about the evolution of medical technology that assists the deaf-blind community. Which of the following is likely NOT a tool that she would discuss in her paper?(1 point)
Responses
Braille
Braille
speechreading
speechreading
tactile signing
tactile signing
closed-captioning systems
1 answer