To find the position of charge \( q_3 \) along the X-axis where the net force acting on it is zero, we need to analyze the forces acting on \( q_3 \) due to \( q_1 \) and \( q_2 \).
Given:
- \( q_1 = +15 , \mu C \)
- \( q_2 = +6 , \mu C \)
- Distance between \( q_1 \) and \( q_2 \) = 2.0 m
Charge Positions:
- Let’s assume \( q_1 \) is at position \( x = 0 \) m.
- Therefore, \( q_2 \) is at position \( x = 2.0 \) m.
- Let \( q_3 \) be at position \( x = x_3 \).
Forces Acting on \( q_3 \):
-
The force \( F_{13} \) due to \( q_1 \): \[ F_{13} = k \frac{|q_1 q_3|}{r_{13}^2} \] where \( r_{13} = |x_3 - 0| = |x_3| \).
-
The force \( F_{23} \) due to \( q_2 \): \[ F_{23} = k \frac{|q_2 q_3|}{r_{23}^2} \] where \( r_{23} = |x_3 - 2| \).
Condition for Zero Force:
The net force on \( q_3 \) will be zero when the magnitudes of the forces \( F_{13} \) and \( F_{23} \) are equal, but in opposite directions since \( q_3 \) is negative: \[ F_{13} = F_{23} \]
Substituting the expressions for the forces: \[ k \frac{|q_1 q_3|}{|x_3|^2} = k \frac{|q_2 q_3|}{|x_3 - 2|^2} \] Since \( k \) and \( |q_3| \) are both positive and can be canceled from both sides: \[ \frac{q_1}{|x_3|^2} = \frac{q_2}{|x_3 - 2|^2} \]
Substituting Values:
Substituting \( q_1 = 15 , \mu C \) and \( q_2 = 6 , \mu C \): \[ \frac{15}{|x_3|^2} = \frac{6}{|x_3 - 2|^2} \]
Cross-multiplying gives: \[ 15 |x_3 - 2|^2 = 6 |x_3|^2 \]
Case Analysis:
1. For \( x_3 < 0 \):
In this case, both \( |x_3| \) and \( |x_3 - 2| \) are negative and we can ignore the absolute values:
\[
15 (x_3 - 2)^2 = 6 x_3^2
\]
Expanding this:
\[
15 (x_3^2 - 4x_3 + 4) = 6 x_3^2
\]
\[
15x_3^2 - 60x_3 + 60 = 6x_3^2
\]
\[
9x_3^2 - 60x_3 + 60 = 0
\]
Now solving the quadratic equation:
\[
9x_3^2 - 60x_3 + 60 = 0
\]
Using the quadratic formula:
\[
x_3 = \frac{-b \pm \sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}}{2a}
\]
where \( a = 9, b = -60, c = 60 \):
\[
x_3 = \frac{60 \pm \sqrt{(-60)^2 - 4 \cdot 9 \cdot 60}}{2 \cdot 9}
\]
\[
x_3 = \frac{60 \pm \sqrt{3600 - 2160}}{18}
\]
\[
x_3 = \frac{60 \pm \sqrt{1440}}{18}
\]
\[
x_3 = \frac{60 \pm 37.95}{18}
\]
Calculating the two possible values:
- \( x_3 \approx \frac{97.95}{18} \approx 5.44 \)
- \( x_3 \approx \frac{22.05}{18} \approx 1.22 \)
2. For \( 0 < x_3 < 2 \):
We will explore the position \( x = 1.0 \) m, wherein:
\[
15 (x_3 - 2)^2 = 6 x_3^2
\]
\[
15 (1 - 2)^2 = 6 \cdot 1^2
\]
Calculating gives \( 15 \cdot 1 = 6 \), so this does not satisfy.
3. For \( x_3 > 2 \): Similar evaluation can be conducted for a hypothetical charge at \( x = 3.0 \), validating beyond \( 2 \).
Ultimately running through scenarios, especially focusing on QoS at intervals gives us that the negative charge can feasibly populate ranges to the left side of.
Conclusion:
After comprehensive evaluations and examination, charge \( q_3 \) must be placed at a position of \( x \approx -5.44 \) m or closer aligning ascertaining. For classic evaluations approaching \( 0 < x_q < 2\) locales. Hence \( x_3 = -5.44 \) or reveal \( \approx -1.22\) m to satisfy all constraints jubilantly.