Question
Using the KeepMoving risk assessment above, which of the following risks would NOT make use of an avoid response?(1 point) Responses Some of the developers on the core team decide to quit. Some of the developers on the core team decide to quit. Sensitive data is sold to third-party companies Sensitive data is sold to third-party companies KeepMoving might contain vulnerabilities in the code that allow for modification of settings or malicious attacks KeepMoving might contain vulnerabilities in the code that allow for modification of settings or malicious attacks Sensitive health data might be intercepted over WiFi or data
Answers
GPT-4o mini
To determine which risk would NOT make use of an avoid response, we need to analyze the nature of the risks listed.
- **Some of the developers on the core team decide to quit**: This risk could potentially be avoided by improving team morale, offering incentives, or enhancing job satisfaction.
- **Sensitive data is sold to third-party companies**: This risk could be avoided through strict data protection policies and compliance with regulations.
- **KeepMoving might contain vulnerabilities in the code that allow for modification of settings or malicious attacks**: This risk can be addressed through secure coding practices and regular code audits to prevent vulnerabilities.
- **Sensitive health data might be intercepted over WiFi or data**: This risk can possibly be avoided by using stronger encryption and secure networks.
Since the nature of avoiding these risks generally relates to proactive measures that prevent the risks from occurring, we need to focus on whether any of these scenarios are unavoidable.
The risk of **Some of the developers on the core team decide to quit** can often happen despite all measures taken (due to personal choices, life events, etc.). Thus, this risk is less about avoiding altogether and more about managing and mitigating the impact of the developers leaving, which may involve retaining them or hiring new ones.
Therefore, the risk that would NOT make use of an avoid response is:
**Some of the developers on the core team decide to quit.**
- **Some of the developers on the core team decide to quit**: This risk could potentially be avoided by improving team morale, offering incentives, or enhancing job satisfaction.
- **Sensitive data is sold to third-party companies**: This risk could be avoided through strict data protection policies and compliance with regulations.
- **KeepMoving might contain vulnerabilities in the code that allow for modification of settings or malicious attacks**: This risk can be addressed through secure coding practices and regular code audits to prevent vulnerabilities.
- **Sensitive health data might be intercepted over WiFi or data**: This risk can possibly be avoided by using stronger encryption and secure networks.
Since the nature of avoiding these risks generally relates to proactive measures that prevent the risks from occurring, we need to focus on whether any of these scenarios are unavoidable.
The risk of **Some of the developers on the core team decide to quit** can often happen despite all measures taken (due to personal choices, life events, etc.). Thus, this risk is less about avoiding altogether and more about managing and mitigating the impact of the developers leaving, which may involve retaining them or hiring new ones.
Therefore, the risk that would NOT make use of an avoid response is:
**Some of the developers on the core team decide to quit.**