Which BEST explains why early print sources have very few illustrations?

Question

A.
They requires a lot of ink, which was very costly.

B.
They were the most expensive part of the printing process.

C.
Most events did not require images to be clearly understood.

D.
Society at the time did not trust information that came from images.

Answer 1

The BEST explanation for why early print sources have very few illustrations is:

A. They require a lot of ink, which was very costly.

In early printing, the cost of ink and the complexity of producing illustrated texts made it economically unfeasible to include many illustrations. While option B also touches on the costs associated with illustrations, option A specifies the primary limiting factor (ink) more directly.