Which two questions would best help a researcher analyze the limitations of evidence?

1 answer

To help a researcher analyze the limitations of evidence, two effective questions could be:

  1. "What are the potential biases or confounding factors that could affect the validity of the evidence?"

    • This question prompts the researcher to consider the influence of personal, cultural, methodological, or situational biases that may skew the results. It also encourages an examination of any external variables that might have unintentionally impacted the findings.
  2. "How reliable and valid are the methods used to collect and analyze the evidence?"

    • This question directs the researcher to critically assess the robustness of the research methodology, including the sampling techniques, data collection tools, and statistical analyses employed. Evaluating the reliability (consistency of results) and validity (accuracy in measuring what it intends to measure) can uncover limitations inherent in the evidence.

These questions create a comprehensive framework for evaluating the quality and credibility of evidence.