Which of the following statements, describes the difference between political systems of Australia and New Zealand

Australia is a constitutional monarchy; New Zealand is a democracy
Australia’s entire territory is rule directly by the central; New Zealand is divided into states
in Australia, citizens are required by law to vote in elections; in New Zealand, voting is not required
Australia does not have a written;

1 answer

Here’s a clarification of the statements you provided regarding the political systems of Australia and New Zealand:

  1. Australia is a constitutional monarchy; New Zealand is a democracy: This statement is misleading. Both countries are constitutional monarchies and parliamentary democracies, recognizing the British monarch as the head of state.

  2. Australia’s entire territory is ruled directly by the central; New Zealand is divided into states: This statement is partially incorrect. Australia is a federation composed of states and territories with their own governments. New Zealand, on the other hand, is a unitary state with a single central government and no states, only regions.

  3. In Australia, citizens are required by law to vote in elections; in New Zealand, voting is not required: This statement is accurate. Australia has compulsory voting laws, while New Zealand does not require its citizens to vote.

  4. Australia does not have a written (constitution): This statement is incomplete. Australia does have a constitution, though it is a mix of written and unwritten traditions.

The most accurate distinction regarding the political systems of Australia and New Zealand is the third statement about voting requirements.