To gather the correct graph for the linear equation \( y = 23x - 1 \), we can identify two key features of the equation:
- Slope: The coefficient of \( x \) (which is 23) indicates a steep incline. For every 1 unit increase in \( x \), \( y \) increases by 23 units.
- Y-intercept: When \( x = 0 \), \( y = -1 \). This is the point where the line crosses the y-axis.
Let's calculate a few points using the equation:
-
For \( x = 0 \): \[ y = 23(0) - 1 = -1 \quad \text{(Point (0, -1))} \]
-
For \( x = 1 \): \[ y = 23(1) - 1 = 22 \quad \text{(Point (1, 22))} \]
-
For \( x = -1 \): \[ y = 23(-1) - 1 = -24 \quad \text{(Point (-1, -24))} \]
Based on these calculations, we can plot (0, -1) and (1, 22) on the graph. Since the slope is very steep, if the plotted points on the graph include (0, -1) and another point close to the coordinates calculated for \( x = 1 \) (or, calculating more points if necessary), it should yield a steep upward line.
Among the options you provided, the correct illustration should show:
- A point at (0, -1)
- Another plotted point that is consistent with a steep slope.
Given the options:
- If one of the given lines passes through the point (0, -1) and aligns with a steep incline, that would be the correct representation of the equation.
Make sure to compare with the calculated values. Since none of the plotted point combinations in the visual options specify (1, 22) which is very high, check points close to the y-intercept to verify the steeper nature of the line described by \( y = 23x - 1 \). However, the correct representation in a feasible range will likely show the quality of that steep slope, perhaps lower end coordinates near (0, -1). If you find points approximate to these, that will be your answer.