The basis for wearing an armband to school in order to protest an action taken by the government, as established in the Supreme Court case Tinker v. Des Moines, is protected symbolic speech. This case recognized that students do not shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech at the schoolhouse gate, as long as their actions do not disrupt the educational process.
Based on the Supreme Court case Tinker v. Des Moines, it would be legal for you to wear an armband to school in order to protest an action taken by our government if it did not create a distraction. What is the basis for this?(1 point)
Responses
protected symbolic speech
protected symbolic speech
freedom to assemble peacefully
freedom to assemble peacefully
Establishment Clause
Establishment Clause
freedom to petition
1 answer