To interpret the data provided in the relative frequency table, let's analyze the statements based on the information:
-
Joint relative frequency of fourth graders with a pet: Fourth graders with a pet = 29%
-
Joint relative frequency of third graders with a pet: Third graders with a pet = 16%
-
More fourth graders responded than third graders: This cannot be determined from the relative frequencies alone without absolute values since we don't know the total number of students in each grade.
-
Most students in the sample have a pet: The total percentage of students with a pet is 45%, which means most do not have a pet (55% do not).
-
Smallest joint relative frequency is third graders without a pet: This would be third graders without a pet = 19%. However, this is not the smallest; the smallest is third graders with a pet at 16%.
Based on these analyses, the correct interpretation from the options provided is:
The largest joint relative frequency is fourth graders with a pet.
This statement is correct because 29% (fourth graders with a pet) is indeed larger than any of the other percentages listed.