Which set of statements is most logical and well-reasoned?(1 point)ResponsesDress codes in public places often forbid the wearing of masks and disguises that make a person’s identity unclear. People who commit crimes often wear masks to hide their identities so that they will not get caught. So, dress codes help prevent crimes.Dress codes in public places often forbid the wearing of masks and disguises that make a person’s identity unclear. People who commit crimes often wear masks to hide their identities so that they will not get caught. So, dress codes help prevent crimes.Residents of Washington, DC, are U.S. citizens who are denied representation in Congress because Washington, DC, is not a state. Representation is a right of all citizens that our founding fathers fought for. So, Washington, DC, should be made a state.Residents of Washington, DC, are U.S. citizens who are denied representation in Congress because Washington, DC, is not a state. Representation is a right of all citizens that our founding fathers fought for. So, Washington, DC, should be made a state.Robots are capable of performing many jobs with even greater skill and accuracy than humans. People need jobs so that they can make money and be functional members of society. So, robots and artificial intelligence are bad for human society.Robots are capable of performing many jobs with even greater skill and accuracy than humans. People need jobs so that they can make money and be functional members of society. So, robots and artificial intelligence are bad for human society.The U.S. Civil War was an important event in the history of the United States. All of the statues in the local public park show historical figures from different eras in U.S. history. So, the statues of Confederate soldiers should be allowed to remain in the park.

asked by lo

9 days ago

8 views

0

0

1 answer

The most logical and well-reasoned set of statements is:

"Residents of Washington, DC, are U.S. citizens who are denied representation in Congress because Washington, DC, is not a state. Representation is a right of all citizens that our founding fathers fought for. So, Washington, DC, should be made a state."

This argument is well-structured as it presents a clear premise regarding citizenship and representation, connects this to a historical context of rights, and concludes with a reasonable suggestion for a solution (statehood for Washington, DC).

The other statements either contain logical fallacies (e.g., assuming that dress codes can prevent crime) or provide conclusions that don't logically follow from their premises (e.g., equating the presence of robots in the workforce with being bad for society without considering potential benefits).

answered by GPT-4o mini

0

0

Question

Which set of statements is most logical and well-reasoned?(1 point)ResponsesDress codes in public places often forbid the wearing of masks and disguises that make a person’s identity unclear. People who commit crimes often wear masks to hide their identities so that they will not get caught. So, dress codes help prevent crimes.Dress codes in public places often forbid the wearing of masks and disguises that make a person’s identity unclear. People who commit crimes often wear masks to hide their identities so that they will not get caught. So, dress codes help prevent crimes.Residents of Washington, DC, are U.S. citizens who are denied representation in Congress because Washington, DC, is not a state. Representation is a right of all citizens that our founding fathers fought for. So, Washington, DC, should be made a state.Residents of Washington, DC, are U.S. citizens who are denied representation in Congress because Washington, DC, is not a state. Representation is a right of all citizens that our founding fathers fought for. So, Washington, DC, should be made a state.Robots are capable of performing many jobs with even greater skill and accuracy than humans. People need jobs so that they can make money and be functional members of society. So, robots and artificial intelligence are bad for human society.Robots are capable of performing many jobs with even greater skill and accuracy than humans. People need jobs so that they can make money and be functional members of society. So, robots and artificial intelligence are bad for human society.The U.S. Civil War was an important event in the history of the United States. All of the statues in the local public park show historical figures from different eras in U.S. history. So, the statues of Confederate soldiers should be allowed to remain in the park.

1 answer

The most logical and well-reasoned set of statements is:

"Residents of Washington, DC, are U.S. citizens who are denied representation in Congress because Washington, DC, is not a state. Representation is a right of all citizens that our founding fathers fought for. So, Washington, DC, should be made a state."

This argument is well-structured as it presents a clear premise regarding citizenship and representation, connects this to a historical context of rights, and concludes with a reasonable suggestion for a solution (statehood for Washington, DC).

The other statements either contain logical fallacies (e.g., assuming that dress codes can prevent crime) or provide conclusions that don't logically follow from their premises (e.g., equating the presence of robots in the workforce with being bad for society without considering potential benefits).

GPT-4o mini · Answer

The most logical and well-reasoned set of statements is:

"Residents of Washington, DC, are U.S. citizens who are denied representation in Congress because Washington, DC, is not a state. Representation is a right of all citizens that our founding fathers fought for. So, Washington, DC, should be made a state."

This argument is well-structured as it presents a clear premise regarding citizenship and representation, connects this to a historical context of rights, and concludes with a reasonable suggestion for a solution (statehood for Washington, DC).

The other statements either contain logical fallacies (e.g., assuming that dress codes can prevent crime) or provide conclusions that don't logically follow from their premises (e.g., equating the presence of robots in the workforce with being bad for society without considering potential benefits).