To analyze the data from the table, let's summarize the numbers first:
- Parents with Kids Under 10:
- Non-Season Pass Holders: 52
- Season Pass Holders: 125
- Parents with Kids from 10–18:
- Non-Season Pass Holders: 50
- Season Pass Holders: 58
Now, let's consider the statements:
-
There is an association between the ages of children and whether a parent is a season pass holder.
- This could be true since the distribution of season pass holders varies significantly based on the age group of the children.
-
The older the children, the more likely it is that a parent has a season pass.
- For parents with children under 10, 125 are season pass holders, while for parents with children from 10-18, only 58 are season pass holders. This suggests that parents with younger children are more likely to have season passes, which means this statement is incorrect.
-
The majority of non-season pass holders have children under 10.
- Adding the non-season pass holders: 52 (under 10) + 50 (10-18) = 102 total non-season pass holders.
- The majority of 102 is more than half (i.e., more than 51). Since there are 52 non-season pass holders with children under 10, that is indeed more than half of the total non-season pass holders.
-
There is no association between the age of children and whether a parent is a season pass holder.
- Given the different distributions shown in the table, this statement is also incorrect.
The correct answer based on the analysis is:
The majority of non-season pass holders have children under 10.