-
a - solids>liquids>gases
-
d - The ionic bonds in salt result in a higher melting point than the covalent bonds in sugar.
-
d - It took several hundred years for scientists to develop current theories, and they are still being revised to this day.
-
b - Consistent results support the validity of the model, while inconsistent results indicate the need to modify the model.
Question
Which correctly orders the strength of the forces between particles of differents physical states?(1 point)
Responses
solids>liquids>gases
solids>liquids>gases
gases>liquids>solids
gases>liquids>solids
liquids>solids>gases
liquids>solids>gases
liquids>gases>solidsQuestion
Which best describes the melting point difference between salt and sugar?(1 point)
Responses
The ionic bonds in salt result in a lower melting point than the covalent bonds in sugar.
The ionic bonds in salt result in a lower melting point than the covalent bonds in sugar.
The covalent bonds in salt result in a lower melting point than the ionic bonds in sugar.
The covalent bonds in salt result in a lower melting point than the ionic bonds in sugar.
The covalent bonds in salt result in a higher melting point than the ionic bonds in sugar.
The covalent bonds in salt result in a higher melting point than the ionic bonds in sugar.
The ionic bonds in salt result in a higher melting point than the covalent bonds in sugar.
The ionic bonds in salt result in a higher melting point than the covalent bonds in sugar.Which statement best describes the development of theories that connected microscopic and macroscopic phenomena?(1 point)
Responses
It took only a few decades for scientists to develop current theories, and they are essentially concrete.
It took only a few decades for scientists to develop current theories, and they are essentially concrete.
It took only a few decades for scientists to develop current theories, and they are still being revised to this day.
It took only a few decades for scientists to develop current theories, and they are still being revised to this day.
It took several hundred years for scientists to develop current theories, and they are essentially concrete.
It took several hundred years for scientists to develop current theories, and they are essentially concrete.
It took several hundred years for scientists to develop current theories, and they are still being revised to this day.Which best describes how the results of experiments investigating the relationship between microscopic and macroscopic phenomena affect a model of molecular theory?(1 point)
Responses
Consistent results indicate the need to modify the model, while inconsistent results support the validity of the model.
Consistent results indicate the need to modify the model, while inconsistent results support the validity of the model.
Consistent results support the validity of the model, while inconsistent results indicate the need to modify the model.
Consistent results support the validity of the model, while inconsistent results indicate the need to modify the model.
Consistent results support the validity of the model, while inconsistent results require throwing out the model entirely.
Consistent results support the validity of the model, while inconsistent results require throwing out the model entirely.
Consistent results require throwing out the model entirely, while inconsistent results support the validity of the model.
just give the answers , also put a b c or d
1 answer