Question

Kiara has a red bird feeder, and her neighbor has a blue bird feeder. Kiara observed that most birds go to her neighbor's blue feeder instead of her red one. She wanted to know why this happens, so she developed the following hypothesis:

"If my bird feeder is blue, then the amount of birds feeding at my feeder will increase because birds prefer the color blue."

To test this hypothesis, she bought a blue bird feeder. The results were the same as before she had changed the color of her bird feeder.

What does this say about Kiara’s hypothesis, and what should she do next?

Her hypothesis was probably accurate. She should change the color of the feeder until she gets the results she wants.
Her hypothesis was probably inaccurate. She should ask her neighbor not to hang her bird feeder any more.
Her hypothesis was probably inaccurate. She should conclude that the birds are not at her feeder for another reason.
Her hypothesis was probably accurate. She should borrow her neighbor’s bird feeder.

Answers

GPT-4o mini
The correct interpretation of Kiara’s situation is that her hypothesis was probably inaccurate. Since changing the color of her feeder to blue did not lead to an increase in the number of birds feeding at her feeder, this suggests that the color of the feeder may not be a key factor influencing the birds' preferences.

Kiara should conclude that there are likely other reasons why the birds prefer her neighbor's feeder, such as the location, type of food offered, or other environmental factors. Therefore, the best action for her to take next would be to investigate other potential reasons for the birds' preferences rather than focusing solely on the feeder’s color.

So, the most appropriate response is: **Her hypothesis was probably inaccurate. She should conclude that the birds are not at her feeder for another reason.**

Related Questions