When comparing the distributions of pets in Mr. Bernhardt's and Ms. Daniel's classes, we can observe key characteristics regarding symmetry and overall trends.
Similarities:
- Both classes show a peak at one pet, with Mr. Bernhardt's class having the highest count at 1 pet (3 students), and Ms. Daniel's class also having a significant number of students (4) with 1 pet.
- In both classes, there are fewer students who reported having either no pets or four pets, creating a similar flatness at the extremes of the distribution.
Differences:
- Mr. Bernhardt’s class has a distribution that leans towards fewer pets overall, with a noticeable drop-off as the number of pets increases, while Ms. Daniel’s class displays a more balanced distribution with peak counts in the middle categories (1 to 3 pets).
- Ms. Daniel's class has no students with zero pets, contrasting with Mr. Bernhardt’s class, which has 2 students with no pets, indicating a more pet-friendly environment in Ms. Daniel's class.
Overall, the distributions differ in their symmetry, as Mr. Bernhardt's distribution is negatively skewed with fewer pets, while Ms. Daniel's distribution is more balanced.