Compare general, limited, and limited liability partnerships. Formulate reasons as to why a group of prospective partners might choose each.(4 points)

short answer

1 answer

Certainly! Here’s a comparison of general, limited, and limited liability partnerships, along with reasons why a group of prospective partners might choose each type:

  1. General Partnership:

    • Definition: All partners share equal responsibility for managing the business and are personally liable for debts and obligations.
    • Reasons for Choice:
      • Simple structure and ease of formation.
      • Direct involvement in management for all partners allows for quick decision-making.
      • Profits are passed through to partners without taxation at the entity level.
  2. Limited Partnership (LP):

    • Definition: Comprises general partners (who manage the business) and limited partners (who invest but do not manage). Limited partners have liability only up to their investment.
    • Reasons for Choice:
      • Attracts investors who want to limit their liability while participating in business profits.
      • Allows general partners to maintain control over business operations while raising capital through limited partners.
      • Flexibility in profit distribution among partners based on investment and agreement rather than equal sharing.
  3. Limited Liability Partnership (LLP):

    • Definition: All partners enjoy limited liability, protecting them from personal responsibility for the debts of the partnership and for the negligent acts of other partners.
    • Reasons for Choice:
      • Protects personal assets from business liabilities, making it attractive for professionals (like lawyers and accountants).
      • Encourages collaboration among partners without the risk of personal loss due to another partner's actions.
      • Combines the tax benefits of a partnership with the liability protections similar to a corporation.

Each type of partnership has its own benefits, making the choice dependent on the partners' goals, desired levels of involvement, and risk tolerance.