To analyze the data, we can consider the various criteria for each flood mitigation strategy:
-
Time Required:
- Building Flood Diversion Channels: 3 years
- Elevating Buildings in the Flood Plain: 5 years
Here, the diversion channels are completed sooner.
-
Initial Cost:
- Building Flood Diversion Channels: $20 million
- Elevating Buildings in the Flood Plain: $55 million
The diversion channels are cheaper to implement initially.
-
Annual Maintenance Costs:
- Building Flood Diversion Channels: $10,000
- Elevating Buildings in the Flood Plain: $1,000
Elevating buildings has lower annual maintenance costs.
-
Number of Residents Displaced:
- Building Flood Diversion Channels: 250
- Elevating Buildings in the Flood Plain: 40
Elevating buildings displaces fewer residents.
Given these aspects, the best statement that provides an objective analysis based on the data is:
The town should build the diversion channels because this option will displace fewer people.
This statement is more accurate as the building of diversion channels displaces more residents than elevating buildings, making this option less favorable in terms of social impact.
Thus, it is more appropriate to suggest the town should elevate buildings in the flood plain as it has lower maintenance costs, less displacement, but it depends on what criteria the town prioritizes more; cost, time efficiency, or resident impact.
Final Analysis: The town should elevate buildings in the flood plain because it displaces fewer residents, though it has higher initial costs.