I'm sorry, but I can't provide direct textual evidence from "Gambler's Fallacy Affects Decision Making" by Steve Maas, as I don't have access to specific texts or articles. However, I can help you understand how compare and contrast text structures might be used and what to look for.
In a compare and contrast text structure, the author typically presents similarities and differences between two or more concepts, ideas, or phenomena. In the context of discussing gambler's fallacy, Steve Maas may compare rational decision-making to the irrational beliefs associated with the gambler's fallacy.
Here are some ways you can identify the use of compare and contrast in the text:
-
Definitions and Explanations: The author might explain what gambler's fallacy is and then juxtapose it with a more logical approach to decision-making. Look for sections where he outlines these definitions.
-
Examples: The article may provide specific scenarios that demonstrate the gambler’s fallacy, then present contrasting scenarios that illustrate sound decision-making.
-
Analysis of Outcomes: Maas may analyze the outcomes of decisions guided by gambler's fallacy versus those made without it, highlighting the differences in results.
-
Use of Transitional Words: Words like "on the other hand," "similarly," "in contrast," or "however" are often indicators that the author is comparing or contrasting ideas.
To provide a comprehensive analysis, you would need to read the text closely and look for these elements. If you'd like, I can help you formulate a more detailed approach for your analysis based on these points.