Question

Question 1 A) For this portfolio, you will write 3 argumentative paragraphs on three different topics. You have to have a clear, specific stance on the argument in your paragraphs, so you must choose one side of the argument to write about. You'll choose your topic and stance for the first and second paragraph. Include at least one piece of evidence and reasoning in your paragraphs. For the third paragraph, you'll respond to the written argument with a counterargument. Again, make sure to include at least one piece of evidence and reasoning in your responses. *You can write your answers in the boxes below OR you can also write your responses in a copy of the Google Doc directions and then submitting that link in one of the boxes below. 1. Choose just one of the arguments listed below to write about in the box. You will include an opening statement (the stance you’re taking on the argument) and provide evidence to support it. In this paragraph, make sure to introduce the opening statement where you clearly state your claim on the argument, and include at least one piece of reasoning to support your claim. You can use a piece of evidence from the optional resource. Your paragraph should be between 4-7 sentences. Should humans focus on exploring deep oceans or outer space? Helpful optional resource here. Should the voting age be lowered to 16? Helpful optional resource here. Should students in high school be required to take a financial literacy class in order to graduate? Helpful optional resource here. (6 points) 0 / 10000 Word Limit B) 2. Next, you’ll do the same thing again! Choose just one of the arguments below to write your paragraph on (4-7 sentences). Include your opening statement, evidence, and reasoning to support your argument in your paragraph response: Should college be free for everyone? Helpful optional resource here. Should social media platforms ban political advertisements? Helpful optional resource here. (6 points) 0 / 10000 Word Limit C) 3. Finally, you'll respond to this argument below. Read the argument carefully. Then, write a counterargument paragraph (4-7 sentences). Your counterargument should include an opening statement that specifically states your claim and includes at least one piece of both evidence and reasoning. Argument: Should high schools require student athletes to maintain a specific GPA? The stance below is saying NO. Here is the response below: High school student athletes should not be required to maintain a specific GPA for a variety of reasons. First, many student athletes have busy training schedules and may travel frequently for their sport. Athletes’ schedules don’t allow for extra time for studying. While academics are important, a mandatory GPA requirement could discourage athletes who struggle in the classroom to continue in sports that may lead to future opportunities, college scholarships, and unique career options. Now, respond to this argument by writing your counterargument below: (6 points)

Answer 1

Question 1 A

Argument: Should students in high school be required to take a financial literacy class in order to graduate?

High school students should be required to take a financial literacy class in order to graduate because understanding personal finance is crucial for their future success. With the increasing complexity of financial products and services, students must be equipped with basic knowledge about budgeting, saving, investing, and managing debt. For instance, a study from the National Endowment for Financial Education indicates that individuals who have received financial education are more likely to make informed financial decisions and avoid common pitfalls, such as high debt levels or poor credit management. By making financial literacy a graduation requirement, schools would ensure that all students are prepared to handle their finances responsibly, thus fostering a generation that is more financially savvy and capable of achieving economic stability.

Question 1 B

Argument: Should college be free for everyone?

College should be free for everyone because access to higher education is a fundamental right that can promote equality and economic growth. Eliminating tuition fees would alleviate the financial burden on students and their families, allowing individuals from all socioeconomic backgrounds to pursue higher education without the fear of crippling debt. According to a study published by the University of California, free college can lead to a more educated workforce, which, in turn, enhances innovation and productivity, ultimately benefiting the economy as a whole. Additionally, countries like Germany and Sweden, where tuition is free, have demonstrated higher graduation rates and lower levels of student debt, suggesting that such models can lead to more equitable opportunities for all individuals.

Question 1 C

Counterargument to: High school student athletes should not be required to maintain a specific GPA.

While it may seem burdensome to require high school student athletes to maintain a specific GPA, having academic standards is essential for promoting discipline and responsibility among young athletes. The primary purpose of attending high school is education, and sports should complement academic efforts rather than overshadow them. By maintaining a minimum GPA requirement, schools help athletes cultivate essential skills like time management and prioritization, which are crucial not just in sports but in all areas of life. Furthermore, according to the NCAA, student-athletes who maintain a higher GPA are more likely to succeed in college, leading to better athletic and academic outcomes. Therefore, enforcing a GPA requirement can encourage student athletes to strive for both academic and athletic excellence, preparing them for a well-rounded future.