Site 2, despite its high risk of earthquakes and other impacts, may be preferable because while seismic activity can be monitored and potentially mitigated, the risk of aquifer contamination at Site 1 poses a direct and long-lasting threat to essential water resources. Moreover, groundwater contamination can have far-reaching consequences for both human health and ecosystems, making the seismic risks at Site 2 potentially more manageable through regulatory measures and engineering solutions.
Virtual fracking lab site 1 has a high risk of aquifier contamination site two has a high risk of earthquakes and other impacts. which site do you think is best for fracking? Site 2 what are potentially the highest risk of environmental impacts at the site you chose? Potentially the highest risk of environmental impacts is groundwater contamination and water stress.
They're high risk at all three sides explain why the risks at the site you chose are preferable to the risks of the other side? Answer in two or three sentences
1 answer